Research Articles

Maybe Diversification Is Not All It's Cracked Up To Be

Chuck Carnevale - Thursday, April 19, 2012

There’s an old cliché about real estate investing that states that the three cardinal rules are: location- location- location.  Clever pundits have borrowed upon this refrain and glibly state that the three most important or cardinal rules of investing are: diversify- diversify- diversify. However, careful analysis will reveal that diversification is a multifaceted concept that has different meanings, benefits and even risks depending on how it’s used and what its ultimate purpose is.  Therefore, my goal is to examine this ubiquitous investing concept from various angles and perspectives.

Diversification Within or Across

When thinking about diversification there are at least two broad categories to contemplate. The first I would call broad diversification or spreading the risk across numerous asset classes. To me, this is analogous to the throw as much mud on the wall as you can while hoping that some will stick idea. Many experts advocate the diversifying broadly approach. However, to my way of thinking, the idea of diversifying just for diversification sake is not always a sound idea. In other words, I would never advocate putting money into an investment that prudent analysis indicated was a bad place to invest just for the sake of so-called diversification.

For example, and I know it is going to generate strong disagreement, I think gold is an asset class at a bubble valuation that should be currently avoided. Personally, I sold mine last summer. The following graph courtesy of Goldprice.org says it all. Gold was an attractive investment in the late 1990’s to early 2000’s, but it is clearly at extremely high levels now. Therefore, I would suggest taking some (or even all) profits. As I have written before, I feel that fixed income (bonds, etc.) is also at an extreme, and therefore, I temporarily also favor avoiding this asset class. I feel that asset classes should only be used for diversification when they are prudent and sound. To force money into a dangerous investment solely for an artificial commitment to diversification makes no sense to me.

Gold a Twenty year History (Courtesy of Goldprice.org)

Furthermore, I tend to have a much narrower view of asset classes than many of my peers. Regarding liquid assets I see only what I call owner-ship or loaner-ship. Where owner-ship represents equity with the investor positioning themselves as an owner/shareholder, and loaner-ship where the investor loans their money at interest. Others might call this equity versus fixed income or stocks versus bonds. In addition to these liquid assets there would also be hard assets such as real estate, precious metals, commodities and art forms that could be considered as options. But the most important point is that deciding what the most appropriate or optimum percentage of your assets should be allocated to these various asset classes is a subject of much debate.

Diversification-what is the goal?

The most common definition, and therefore use, of diversification is as a risk management technique. This most basic concept of diversification says that you should not put all of your eggs in one basket.  On the other hand, assuming that this is wise counsel raises the question: how many baskets is the appropriate number? Should you spread your money over 5 baskets, 10 baskets, 20 baskets, 100 baskets or 1000 baskets?  In other words, what is the optimum number of baskets; how many baskets are enough and/or how many are too many?

When dealing with broad diversification, I refer you back to my previous comments regarding equity versus debt. There are many who advocate cute little rules that they promote as the proper way to apply broad diversification. For example, one of the more popular rules of thumb goes something like this: Subtract your age from 100 and put the resulting percentage in stocks; the rest in bonds. In other words, if you're 20 years old, put 80% of your assets in stocks; 20% in bonds. If you are 60 years old, put 40% of your assets in stocks and 60% in bonds, etc. Somehow, these little rules of thumb leave me cold. To my way of thinking, a proper asset allocation plan should be based on the individual’s goals, objectives and risk tolerances. When dealing with these kinds of issues, one size rarely fits all.

Next there’s the issue of whether your diversification objectives are geared towards reducing risk or maximizing return. An investor with a high tolerance for risk would take a different view of what optimum diversification is versus a person who is very risk averse. An individual with a high tolerance for risk might choose only to invest in equities in lieu of owning any fixed income assets. Who can say that this is a bad decision when it suits the investors’ goals and risk tolerances? This then takes us to the questions pertaining to optimum diversification within an asset class.

The most interesting aspect of these important questions is the fact that there is no consensus view. Some experts argue in favor of more diversification while others favor less.  For example, Charlie Munger, the famed partner of Warren Buffett, believes that 3 to 5 companies in a stock portfolio is enough diversification.  Charlie is alleged to have said that diversification is for idiots.  And he is quoted as saying: “wide diversification, which necessarily includes investment in mediocre businesses, only guarantees ordinary results. “ Alternatively, Warren Buffett seems to agree and has said: “diversification is protection against ignorance.” 

In contrast, Peter Lynch, the famed manager of the Fidelity Magellan Fund during its glory years held more than 1000 stocks in his portfolio.  What is most amazing about this fact is that Peter created one of the strongest long-term track records of any mutual fund that ever existed.  Ironically, this is the same man who is credited with coining the phrase “di-worse-i-fication.” What many people fail to realize about this is that Peter was referring to an individual company diversifying outside of its core competency through acquisitions. Yet when building his own portfolio, he was happy to own hundreds or even thousands of individual companies.

Then of course there is another aspect of diversifying within an asset class. As it pertains to equities, investors could have a choice of various classes of common stocks. These would include growth stocks versus dividend paying stocks, small stocks versus large stocks, etc. Once again, the investor is faced with the issue of how much should be in growth, how much should be in value, how much should be in large, how much of the small, and on and on. I don’t believe there is a general answer. The right answer is the answer that best fits the individual’s needs and goals.

And the same concept would apply to investing in bonds. A prudent bond investor might want to ladder their portfolio over various maturities. How much they would allocate to longer maturities versus how much they would allocate to shorter maturities would depend on their belief as to where interest rates might be headed in conjunction with where they feel they are today. If the investor feels that rates are very low they would want to rely more on shorter maturities so that their money would mature into higher interest rates, if they believe rates were going higher. Conversely, if they feel that interest rates are very high they would want to orient their portfolio to the longest maturities possible in order to lock in the higher rates for as long as they possibly could. These considerations would have a major impact on their overall diversification strategy.

There is another argument that the Buffets and Mungers of the world offer against broad diversification. These investors who favor a more concentrated approach believe in essentially two things. First, they believe that extraordinary above-average investments are rare. They further argue that every investment you add would be, or should be, of lesser opportunity than your best choice is. In other words, your best stock will generate a higher return than your second best and so on. Their second belief is that you can only truly know enough about a very select number of companies to be able to invest wisely. Therefore, the more companies you include in your portfolio, the more diluted your knowledge about each will be. In other words they believe in placing all their eggs in one basket (or at least a very few baskets) and then watch that basket very carefully.

Diversification For Maximum Return Or Minimum Risk

As I’ve previously alluded, diversification is most commonly thought of as a way to reduce risk. However, the opposite side of the diversification coin is rate of return. Diversification, or the lack thereof, will have or should have a large and direct impact on the ultimate return that a portfolio will generate. However, the precise impact is once again a matter of debate. For example, in theory, the more fixed income a portfolio contains the lower the rate of return it would be expected to generate. In his best-selling book Beating the Street, Peter Lynch offered up this 26th Rule of his 25 Golden Rules of Investing (yes, it was his 26th of 25):

“in the long run, a portfolio of well-chosen stocks and/or equity mutual funds will always outperform a portfolio of bonds or a money market account. In the long run, a portfolio of poorly chosen stocks won’t outperform the money left under the mattress.”

Or you might prefer Peter’s principle number two:

“gentlemen who prefer bonds don’t know what they are missing.”

Perhaps the moral of this story is that diversification has its pluses, but also has its minuses. While it can protect against risk and even smooth out long-term returns; it accomplishes all this at a cost.  The seminal question is whether or not you, the individual investor, is willing or even capable of paying the price? Or put another way, how much rate of return are you willing to give up, to buy how much peace of mind?  Again, I see this as an individual decision, and perhaps even more importantly, a function of the amount of knowledge you the individual investor possesses and the amount of volatility risk you can endure. Clearly, most of us are not Charlie Munger or Warren Buffett that can afford the luxury of a highly concentrated portfolio. On the other hand, we don't want to be guilty of "di-worse-ification" either. At the end of the day, finding the right balance is as much a personal thing as it is an ironclad principle. At least it is in my way of thinking.

A  Fun Look at Diversification Within the Asset Class Equity (stocks)

As I went through the process of researching diversification I came across some interesting results that frankly astounded me. Therefore, I thought it would be fun to share what I discovered. First of all, the primary goal of my research was an attempt to ascertain how much diversification within an asset class was the appropriate amount. Stated more simply, how many stocks were enough to protect the money and how many stocks were too much to dilute or destroy returns. Although I didn't come up with a precise answer that satisfied me, I did discover some fascinating numbers.

Utilizing the F.A.S.T. Graphs research tool I ran 20-year track records on several well-known indices that contained a low of 30 stocks all the way up to 5000 stocks. Before I ran these various records, I assumed that the indicie with the least number of companies would produce the highest rates of return and vice versa.

30 Dow Jones Industrials’ 20-year Record

My first example is the DJIA, because it is a diversified portfolio but only contains 30 names. As expected, the 30 Dow Jones Industrials did produce the highest rate of return at 7.3% per annum.

The S&P 500 Without Dividends

My second example is the S&P 500. Since the index contains 500 companies, I expected to see a lower annual rate of return due to the much broader diversification. Even though I was correct, the return differential was only 1.2% per annum coming in at 6.1%. From the standpoint of risk, you could say that you didn't give up much return for the greater safety.

Since this article is all about diversification, I have included the sector breakdown of the S&P 500 in order to illustrate the diversification within this broad index. I found it interesting that Information Technology was the biggest sector at 20.46%. To me this indicates that the S&P 500 is actually an aggressive index, even though it is diversified.

Russell 3000 Index Without Dividends

With my third example I increased the size of the universe by a factor of 5 by calculating the Russell 3000. Astonishingly, this larger universe actually generated a modestly higher rate of return of 6.3% per annum versus 6.1% for the S&P 500. In this case, greater diversification actually increased my return, but not by very much.

The Dow Jones Wilshire 5000

With my final example I calculated the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 composite which at 5000 names was the biggest index I could find. Remarkably, this biggest index of all produced the second highest rate of return at 6.4% per annum.

Frankly, I'm not really certain what to make of the results I discovered. From what I learned, diversification doesn't really impact the rate of return by very much when looked at from the perspective of the average company in the universe. This led me to wondering what a universe of the top 10 best performing stocks might look like. Of course I recognize that the flaw in this line of thinking would be having the foresight to pick the top 10 at the beginning of this exercise. However, my curiosity was not about being smart enough to pick the very best; instead, I was just curious to know what the differentials would actually be.

Therefore, I first sorted the top 10 of the 30 Dow Jones Industrials and listed them in order of best-performing to lowest-performing for the past 20 years. The average performance of an equally weighted investment in each of these candidates would have averaged approximately 13.8% per annum which is just shy of doubling the rate of return for the entire composite of 30 names. To put this into perspective, $1 million equally allocated total investment spread into these top 10 companies would grow to over $12 million in 20 years.  I thought this was interesting, but not terribly exciting. The following table shows the results of the top 10 best-performing 30 Dow Jones Industrials with $100,000 invested in each at the beginning of 1993.

 

With my second example I went to the larger universe of the S&P 500. With a much bigger universe to draw upon a discovered a significantly higher average rate of return. As it relates to diversification, I'm really not sure what this means other than a bigger universe offered a much bigger opportunity to find significantly above-average investments. The top 10 best-performing S&P 500 companies produced an average return of almost 25% per annum. Therefore, the same $1 million equally allocated across these 10 names grew to over $68 million. Now, that number got my attention.

Now, once again, admitting that this last little exercise is fraught with error, I do feel that it revealed some interesting information. Perhaps most importantly, it did reveal a large disparity between the best performers versus the average performance. If you did possess the skills of a legendary investor, you just might be better served to focus your attention on only a few of the very best companies you could identify. However, for the rest of us we might be best served by placing our money spread out and into more baskets.

Summary and Conclusions

As I began digging into the many faces of diversification, I quickly learned that it is a much more complex concept than at first meets the eye. But perhaps most importantly of all, I feel I learned that there is no one-size-fits-all or even a set of universally applicable rules or principles. To a great extent, diversification turns out to be a very personal issue. How much or how little depends more on your goals and objectives, the knowledge and experience you possess, the time you can allocate to your investment portfolio, and of course, your tolerance for risk. Some of us need a great deal of diversification, while others could do with a lot less.

I will conclude this article by confidently stating that it only scratches the surface of what a comprehensive treatise on diversification would require. In many ways, I feel that I raised more questions than I answered. Therefore, I expect that more articles will be forthcoming. The one area that I feel I shortchanged the most was the area of broad diversification across many different asset classes. Consequently, an article dealing specifically with this aspect of diversification seems like a logical next step. However, I will end by saying once again that I believe that it is also a very personal concept. On the other hand, I do believe that no asset class should ever be used unless it makes prudent economic sense to include it.

Disclosure:  Long MCHP, MSFT, CVX, ESRX, XOM, UTX, CSCO & INTC at the time of writing.

Disclaimer: The opinions in this document are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the stocks mentioned or to solicit transactions or clients. Past performance of the companies discussed may not continue and the companies may not achieve the earnings growth as predicted. The information in this document is believed to be accurate, but under no circumstances should a person act upon the information contained within. We do not recommend that anyone act upon any investment information without first consulting an investment advisor as to the suitability of such investments for his specific situation.

Comments
Anonymous commented on 12-Oct-2012 03:56 PM
occungubobact Ugg Boots sale
LeatabampYou Could Try HERE
http://genuineuggboots88.webeden.co.uk
Anonymous commented on 13-Oct-2012 03:01 AM
Hi to every body, it's my first pay a visit of this blog; this weblog includes awesome and genuinely excellent stuff for readers.
Anonymous commented on 13-Oct-2012 05:37 AM
occungubobact ugg boots sale uk
LeatabampDiscover More
http://genuineuggboots88.webeden.co.uk
Anonymous commented on 17-Oct-2012 02:20 PM
north face outlet Qk58nhXb04north face outlet Qt14icTf36north face jackets An80ehQm34http://www.cheapnorthfacejacketsoutlet.eu 2bx
Anonymous commented on 17-Oct-2012 02:24 PM
moncler sale Nc34azDa00 moncler jackets Jr38lcBd93 moncler jackets Xg08vwZt39http://www.monclerjacketsuk.eu 2ax
Anonymous commented on 18-Oct-2012 10:28 AM
Hi, Neat post. There's an issue with your web site in web explorer, would check this¡K IE nonetheless is the market leader and a good section of other folks will omit your magnificent writing due to this problem.
pokies online aussie pokies casino games
Anonymous commented on 18-Oct-2012 01:27 PM
It is in point of fact a nice and helpful piece of information. I¡¦m satisfied that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.sump pump
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 02:16 AM
The must have summer
Canada Goose JacketsOutlet styles include the timeless denim and leather as well as cropped and trench-style style items.
Canada Goose Parkas Outletare great in winter for warmth; they can be great on different styles and can go with casual or formal looks.The
Canada Goose OutletExpedition Parka provides heavy-duty warmth thanks to its high-quality duck down insulation.It is not a novelty that military style tops the leading fashion trends
Canada Goose Jackets Outletdue to its refined and classic influences and qualities.
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 02:21 AM
The must have summer
Canada Goose JacketsOutlet styles include the timeless denim and leather as well as cropped and trench-style style items.
Canada Goose Parkas Outletare great in winter for warmth; they can be great on different styles and can go with casual or formal looks.The
Canada Goose OutletExpedition Parka provides heavy-duty warmth thanks to its high-quality duck down insulation.It is not a novelty that military style tops the leading fashion trends
Canada Goose Jackets Outletdue to its refined and classic influences and qualities.
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 04:08 AM
Designs of this season give you the unlimited cool feelings in this cool summer. The new designs of Coach products in the Coach Outlet enrich our daily life.
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 03:17 PM
Very interesting points you have mentioned , thankyou for putting up. "Nothing ever goes away." by Barry Commoner.Visit This LinkGoing Hereshe saidcheck herelink
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 07:09 PM

Anonymous commented on 21-Oct-2012 04:12 PM
I think other web site proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and great user friendly style and design, as well as the content. You're an expert in this topic!halogen oven reviews
Anonymous commented on 22-Oct-2012 12:20 PM
great post, very informative. I ponder why the other specialists of this sector do not realize this. You must proceed your writing. I'm sure, you've a huge readers' base already!kasino online
Anonymous commented on 22-Oct-2012 04:53 PM
Just desire to say your article is as astonishing. The clearness in your post is simply cool and i could assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work. Dehumidifier review | coffee grinder review |generator |http://humidifierreviews.us | leaf blower |paint sprayer

Post a Comment




Captcha Image


Testimonials


“I appreciate your work, Chuck. As a subscriber to FAST Graphs™, I use the tool to decide on whether to purchase additional shares of what I currently hold or to add a new holding. Your articles help me make full use of the tool and give other readers valuable information, if they take the time to learn. One of the biggest enhancements that I use is the FFO data added for MLPs and REITs.”


“When FAST Graphs™ were unavailable because of Hurricane Sandy, I realized how much I need them in order to make investment decisions.

(Wish I could be) Long FAST Graphs!!!”


“One more vote for the value of FAST Graphs™; just started a subscription to Chuck's great service (premium), and am having a ball analyzing so many stocks quickly.”


“I feel very ill-equipped to make investment decisions without Fast Graphs. :-)”


“Yesterday, I signed up for your F.A.S.T. Graphs™. It's a really amazing, valuable tool for checking over/undervaluation of stocks. Wish I had it years and years ago!!”


“Love the F.A.S.T. Graphs™: One glance and you know a whole lot.”


“About Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™: They are invaluable to me in making decisions about the stocks I own (in addition to what you are saying about doing other research) and the ones I hope to own in the future.”


"Chuck -- Your proprietary F.A.S.T. Graphs™ are a VERY impressive tool!"


“If there were an Investor Hall of Fame for people who have helped others with their investing, and sharing valuable information, you and your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ would get one of my selections.”


“I love Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™! Well worth the price of admission for what he gives you.”


"Chuck - Thank you for your well thought out articles. I tend to be a visual type of person so I really appreciate the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ approach."


"Great article, as always! I always look forward to your articles, and am especially eagerly awaiting your next in this series. I find the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ extremely helpful."


“Your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ put all of this in a single artful picture and the accompanying spreadsheets hammer home the point.”


“I use the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ method to evaluate all of my ideas. I recommend it for individual investors, since it helps them focus on data and get past the many emotional arguments.”


“I recently subscribed to the F.A.S.T. Graphs™, and these articles are helping me learn how to better use them. They really do give you a good quick look at the valuations picture. A much needed tool!”


“I also always appreciate the clear-cut information provided through your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ and articles.”


“Thanks, Chuck, for your F.A.S.T. Graphs™. Each of these graphs is worth 1,000 words in describing a company's growth, consistency and valuation. Thanks for sharing your graphs.”


“Thanks, Chuck. Love the F.A.S.T. Graphs™! It makes investing so much more clear.”


“Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™: They are invaluable to me in making decisions about the stocks I own (in addition to what you are saying about doing other research) and the ones I hope to own in the future.”


”I am amazed at the usefulness of your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ and I plan on using them for a long time to come.”


“Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™ will give you a tool to find those well chosen stocks...”


“Thanks for the F.A.S.T. Graphs™, Chuck. They are the best tool I've used.”


Recent Posts


Tags

SBR CLX,EMR stock HSNI POWR DollarCostAverging OHI GAS Contenders true worth CRI Ratio TEF PNR rate of return TU ECHO DDS AGLP dividend-paying NOG NEE BMS WRLD CASY ABT BG SHPG FBHS APEI long-term investing ICLR GPS XRX ADM mid-cap DLPH OKE SNH HAS UTX JKHY JOY FAF BR TWX ANTM Buffett ENDP blue chip CAH KO,CLX,CELG,JCP,GT,MSI,PEP,ED SNCR GPC LMT AMT CAPE FRED PCP STMP LQDT CSCO MGEE PB HPQ DividendAristocrats cyclical LZB JWML.Y LLL WHR IR dividend income UNP CTAS intrinsic value,stocks,earnings,fundamentals,stock research tool,due diligence MDT PSX NSR AA AKRX EXLS DMRC PFG BAX POT CFR ASNA CAT Champions EXC PCLN SRCE AFL NSRGY LOW CVS ETP FairlyValued growth SYY AMGN long-term ENSG Market Outlook TROW THO VVC InformationTech THFF CVX Dividend Ideas MAIN GEOS REITs JRN NFLX HNZ TSCO ROSE BAC KFT investing for income,growth and income EPHC BEAV THRM NLY SILVER MYL MPW LL TNC RBC MRK CACI DELL high-yield PNW Telecommunications MUR MAN IBN HighQuality VRTU RIMM Fundamentals Industrial BCOR ALB AIRM CSL VCO FC dividends GWW ZUMZ MAT UEPS GPCM WU stock research tool dividend MNTX C FTI,HTZ LINE SBUX ACM total return PEG Utilities OUTR investing for total return SWK CLX MCK Stock Research Analysis utility IR, NC TXT GrowthOriented VTR DKS growth stocks SU DR WSM CNC MSA UL CB PortfolioDesign O NOC PowerOfCompounding BBBY EK BOKF SYNA DTE POR ACE best-of-breed ACQ AM consumer RCII MGRC biotech COST AGN FOMC ACN SPLS DFS dividendpaying SCG HIBB PII CHE GT BLL HCI JCI MIDD LXU MATW CBI XOM RJF HCBK MNK CLR BigFive,Canadian short ideas EWBC Consumer discretionary PRXL CKSW SO SIVB EBAY REXX BDX fair valuation EMR EnergySector TGH PRGO RSG,RTN NA ANDE MSFT WY SHR TOT COH GLT DIS ATW TE JAZZ hyper growth stocks FinancialSector intrinsic value D RY ED:SCG intrinsicvalue stocks SXL PCL CINF SON AVP GES SAVE SBRA value PE Ratio fair value KMT FLIC TNGO ACR ESI BCE UHS regional banks DividendIncome HE VMI PM P GMCR WLP EE Valuation DOW FOSL HON HBI stockResearchTool ACOM SAM PE COO MMM TGI ALTE UNH PRAA APD TIS HSY OKS dividend paying HCP ABBV MGA RKT FTR OHI,EPR,WPG,JLL cash flows RTN T FDX fundamental stock research tool TRV WST LO WWW WVR HCN AMZN CBRL X MA DAN INT AET MKC INFY PBI SCHW treasury AEP MSCC DPS MDP EMR, MMM value-oriented CNSL QCOR FAST Graphs ABC due diligence MHP PPG BLK ConsumerDiscretionary HGT M InterestRates DVA macro ATHM BA food service market currents MCY DRI dividend paying stocks MO SUBX MTZ UN TEVA BIIB ITW utility stocks SLW MELI ETN value trap KO CHD GOOGL GIS OSIS DD JWN GNTX PKG CBU DGAS DECK IDA earnings HSC JNJ RRC dividend growth Aristocrats SCL CPB QCOM AZZ GILD DGX KALU NVS ITW, dividendGrowth NPM SEIC EAT CL mid-sized investing OZRK ARLP CPN STE technology BHB CM AVD MTW AAPL NSC dividends,earnings growth FDO IPAR ULTA BF.B US Economy CATY BANF KR KCAP MNST HRL HCA FF WFC CR WFM COL V AZO cashflow SIG AMG TWGP RatofReturn DOV FISV TMP capital appreciation SHOO AFG CERN portfolio AFAM AMBN DNB act HII BKH ACI SLGN XEL AFSI AMAG ODFL TEG: WEC: HP AXP CIO CanadianBanks ARRS LKQ BRLI dividend-growth BOFI AMCX BOBE ABM SPY CTBI AAN APH FL RRD value investing CTRX HD RMD GPI ORI WASH ZBRA BRS banks PNRA CTL Yield WBA BMO fastgraphs BHP CTCM AIG Materials CCK retirement market BPL MCHP SoundValuation INTC WEC FLO LTM TAC NTES long-term returns beta BMRC CTG PNM CHS GOLD Dividend Champions ONE RDS.A DOM RSG dividend growth investing DORM GME HOG investment diversified machinery WMT,ROST,GIS,GE,JNJ,KO SYT BH market timing SNI AB highqualityR 3NSRGY SWKS FairValuation PDFS KSS FRAN ED ADT earnings growth DTV suvivorship basis DLR BNS F biotechnology RS K GE JSFT ROST WMT SJM TGT Challengers above-average Bond,TGT,UTX PPL BNS. LH WIN MCD RAI NKE investing for income TSM MNR SHW ADP PEP GD WAG CAM FB blue-chip Overvalued WGL ETR VZ UNM PFE OGE AMP MHS BWP CMI CGY AEG TICC JPM ECL DHR INGR ORCL FAST KMB NROM CELG suvivorship DTEGY DRIP DE HRS healthcare Utilities Sector fast-growing marketvaluation CE sell Macro view TIF OII BEN EV long ideas machinery long BWLD Aristocrat SYK INWK CTSH AOS BCR LEN long-term growth free cash flow LLY POM cash flow COP OXY RSO PAG DRC AAP URI stock research TUP FCFS Share Buybacks PG economy DividendChampions ESRX CXRX interest rates R VRX ITC SFG EMC JCOM GOOG VAL CRLI CLF BIDU SWFT KMP CACC VFC UTHR CVX,SWK,MCD,TGT,PG,WMT,JNJ,MDT,AFT,T,ED BAP BBY BMTC stock analysis AFL,CVX,ED,JNJ,MCD,PG,SWK,T,WMT,TGT,ABM,AFL,BEN,BMS,CB,CBSH,CTBI THC IBM CSX FUL

Archive

Testimonials


“I appreciate your work, Chuck. As a subscriber to FAST Graphs™, I use the tool to decide on whether to purchase additional shares of what I currently hold or to add a new holding. Your articles help me make full use of the tool and give other readers valuable information, if they take the time to learn. One of the biggest enhancements that I use is the FFO data added for MLPs and REITs.”


“When FAST Graphs™ were unavailable because of Hurricane Sandy, I realized how much I need them in order to make investment decisions.

(Wish I could be) Long FAST Graphs!!!”


“One more vote for the value of FAST Graphs™; just started a subscription to Chuck's great service (premium), and am having a ball analyzing so many stocks quickly.”


“I feel very ill-equipped to make investment decisions without Fast Graphs. :-)”


“Yesterday, I signed up for your F.A.S.T. Graphs™. It's a really amazing, valuable tool for checking over/undervaluation of stocks. Wish I had it years and years ago!!”


“Love the F.A.S.T. Graphs™: One glance and you know a whole lot.”


“About Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™: They are invaluable to me in making decisions about the stocks I own (in addition to what you are saying about doing other research) and the ones I hope to own in the future.”


"Chuck -- Your proprietary F.A.S.T. Graphs™ are a VERY impressive tool!"


“If there were an Investor Hall of Fame for people who have helped others with their investing, and sharing valuable information, you and your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ would get one of my selections.”


“I love Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™! Well worth the price of admission for what he gives you.”


"Chuck - Thank you for your well thought out articles. I tend to be a visual type of person so I really appreciate the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ approach."


"Great article, as always! I always look forward to your articles, and am especially eagerly awaiting your next in this series. I find the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ extremely helpful."


“Your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ put all of this in a single artful picture and the accompanying spreadsheets hammer home the point.”


“I use the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ method to evaluate all of my ideas. I recommend it for individual investors, since it helps them focus on data and get past the many emotional arguments.”


“I recently subscribed to the F.A.S.T. Graphs™, and these articles are helping me learn how to better use them. They really do give you a good quick look at the valuations picture. A much needed tool!”


“I also always appreciate the clear-cut information provided through your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ and articles.”


“Thanks, Chuck, for your F.A.S.T. Graphs™. Each of these graphs is worth 1,000 words in describing a company's growth, consistency and valuation. Thanks for sharing your graphs.”


“Thanks, Chuck. Love the F.A.S.T. Graphs™! It makes investing so much more clear.”


“Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™: They are invaluable to me in making decisions about the stocks I own (in addition to what you are saying about doing other research) and the ones I hope to own in the future.”


”I am amazed at the usefulness of your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ and I plan on using them for a long time to come.”


“Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™ will give you a tool to find those well chosen stocks...”


“Thanks for the F.A.S.T. Graphs™, Chuck. They are the best tool I've used.”