Research Articles

Maybe Diversification Is Not All It's Cracked Up To Be

Chuck Carnevale - Thursday, April 19, 2012

There’s an old cliché about real estate investing that states that the three cardinal rules are: location- location- location.  Clever pundits have borrowed upon this refrain and glibly state that the three most important or cardinal rules of investing are: diversify- diversify- diversify. However, careful analysis will reveal that diversification is a multifaceted concept that has different meanings, benefits and even risks depending on how it’s used and what its ultimate purpose is.  Therefore, my goal is to examine this ubiquitous investing concept from various angles and perspectives.

Diversification Within or Across

When thinking about diversification there are at least two broad categories to contemplate. The first I would call broad diversification or spreading the risk across numerous asset classes. To me, this is analogous to the throw as much mud on the wall as you can while hoping that some will stick idea. Many experts advocate the diversifying broadly approach. However, to my way of thinking, the idea of diversifying just for diversification sake is not always a sound idea. In other words, I would never advocate putting money into an investment that prudent analysis indicated was a bad place to invest just for the sake of so-called diversification.

For example, and I know it is going to generate strong disagreement, I think gold is an asset class at a bubble valuation that should be currently avoided. Personally, I sold mine last summer. The following graph courtesy of Goldprice.org says it all. Gold was an attractive investment in the late 1990’s to early 2000’s, but it is clearly at extremely high levels now. Therefore, I would suggest taking some (or even all) profits. As I have written before, I feel that fixed income (bonds, etc.) is also at an extreme, and therefore, I temporarily also favor avoiding this asset class. I feel that asset classes should only be used for diversification when they are prudent and sound. To force money into a dangerous investment solely for an artificial commitment to diversification makes no sense to me.

Gold a Twenty year History (Courtesy of Goldprice.org)

Furthermore, I tend to have a much narrower view of asset classes than many of my peers. Regarding liquid assets I see only what I call owner-ship or loaner-ship. Where owner-ship represents equity with the investor positioning themselves as an owner/shareholder, and loaner-ship where the investor loans their money at interest. Others might call this equity versus fixed income or stocks versus bonds. In addition to these liquid assets there would also be hard assets such as real estate, precious metals, commodities and art forms that could be considered as options. But the most important point is that deciding what the most appropriate or optimum percentage of your assets should be allocated to these various asset classes is a subject of much debate.

Diversification-what is the goal?

The most common definition, and therefore use, of diversification is as a risk management technique. This most basic concept of diversification says that you should not put all of your eggs in one basket.  On the other hand, assuming that this is wise counsel raises the question: how many baskets is the appropriate number? Should you spread your money over 5 baskets, 10 baskets, 20 baskets, 100 baskets or 1000 baskets?  In other words, what is the optimum number of baskets; how many baskets are enough and/or how many are too many?

When dealing with broad diversification, I refer you back to my previous comments regarding equity versus debt. There are many who advocate cute little rules that they promote as the proper way to apply broad diversification. For example, one of the more popular rules of thumb goes something like this: Subtract your age from 100 and put the resulting percentage in stocks; the rest in bonds. In other words, if you're 20 years old, put 80% of your assets in stocks; 20% in bonds. If you are 60 years old, put 40% of your assets in stocks and 60% in bonds, etc. Somehow, these little rules of thumb leave me cold. To my way of thinking, a proper asset allocation plan should be based on the individual’s goals, objectives and risk tolerances. When dealing with these kinds of issues, one size rarely fits all.

Next there’s the issue of whether your diversification objectives are geared towards reducing risk or maximizing return. An investor with a high tolerance for risk would take a different view of what optimum diversification is versus a person who is very risk averse. An individual with a high tolerance for risk might choose only to invest in equities in lieu of owning any fixed income assets. Who can say that this is a bad decision when it suits the investors’ goals and risk tolerances? This then takes us to the questions pertaining to optimum diversification within an asset class.

The most interesting aspect of these important questions is the fact that there is no consensus view. Some experts argue in favor of more diversification while others favor less.  For example, Charlie Munger, the famed partner of Warren Buffett, believes that 3 to 5 companies in a stock portfolio is enough diversification.  Charlie is alleged to have said that diversification is for idiots.  And he is quoted as saying: “wide diversification, which necessarily includes investment in mediocre businesses, only guarantees ordinary results. “ Alternatively, Warren Buffett seems to agree and has said: “diversification is protection against ignorance.” 

In contrast, Peter Lynch, the famed manager of the Fidelity Magellan Fund during its glory years held more than 1000 stocks in his portfolio.  What is most amazing about this fact is that Peter created one of the strongest long-term track records of any mutual fund that ever existed.  Ironically, this is the same man who is credited with coining the phrase “di-worse-i-fication.” What many people fail to realize about this is that Peter was referring to an individual company diversifying outside of its core competency through acquisitions. Yet when building his own portfolio, he was happy to own hundreds or even thousands of individual companies.

Then of course there is another aspect of diversifying within an asset class. As it pertains to equities, investors could have a choice of various classes of common stocks. These would include growth stocks versus dividend paying stocks, small stocks versus large stocks, etc. Once again, the investor is faced with the issue of how much should be in growth, how much should be in value, how much should be in large, how much of the small, and on and on. I don’t believe there is a general answer. The right answer is the answer that best fits the individual’s needs and goals.

And the same concept would apply to investing in bonds. A prudent bond investor might want to ladder their portfolio over various maturities. How much they would allocate to longer maturities versus how much they would allocate to shorter maturities would depend on their belief as to where interest rates might be headed in conjunction with where they feel they are today. If the investor feels that rates are very low they would want to rely more on shorter maturities so that their money would mature into higher interest rates, if they believe rates were going higher. Conversely, if they feel that interest rates are very high they would want to orient their portfolio to the longest maturities possible in order to lock in the higher rates for as long as they possibly could. These considerations would have a major impact on their overall diversification strategy.

There is another argument that the Buffets and Mungers of the world offer against broad diversification. These investors who favor a more concentrated approach believe in essentially two things. First, they believe that extraordinary above-average investments are rare. They further argue that every investment you add would be, or should be, of lesser opportunity than your best choice is. In other words, your best stock will generate a higher return than your second best and so on. Their second belief is that you can only truly know enough about a very select number of companies to be able to invest wisely. Therefore, the more companies you include in your portfolio, the more diluted your knowledge about each will be. In other words they believe in placing all their eggs in one basket (or at least a very few baskets) and then watch that basket very carefully.

Diversification For Maximum Return Or Minimum Risk

As I’ve previously alluded, diversification is most commonly thought of as a way to reduce risk. However, the opposite side of the diversification coin is rate of return. Diversification, or the lack thereof, will have or should have a large and direct impact on the ultimate return that a portfolio will generate. However, the precise impact is once again a matter of debate. For example, in theory, the more fixed income a portfolio contains the lower the rate of return it would be expected to generate. In his best-selling book Beating the Street, Peter Lynch offered up this 26th Rule of his 25 Golden Rules of Investing (yes, it was his 26th of 25):

“in the long run, a portfolio of well-chosen stocks and/or equity mutual funds will always outperform a portfolio of bonds or a money market account. In the long run, a portfolio of poorly chosen stocks won’t outperform the money left under the mattress.”

Or you might prefer Peter’s principle number two:

“gentlemen who prefer bonds don’t know what they are missing.”

Perhaps the moral of this story is that diversification has its pluses, but also has its minuses. While it can protect against risk and even smooth out long-term returns; it accomplishes all this at a cost.  The seminal question is whether or not you, the individual investor, is willing or even capable of paying the price? Or put another way, how much rate of return are you willing to give up, to buy how much peace of mind?  Again, I see this as an individual decision, and perhaps even more importantly, a function of the amount of knowledge you the individual investor possesses and the amount of volatility risk you can endure. Clearly, most of us are not Charlie Munger or Warren Buffett that can afford the luxury of a highly concentrated portfolio. On the other hand, we don't want to be guilty of "di-worse-ification" either. At the end of the day, finding the right balance is as much a personal thing as it is an ironclad principle. At least it is in my way of thinking.

A  Fun Look at Diversification Within the Asset Class Equity (stocks)

As I went through the process of researching diversification I came across some interesting results that frankly astounded me. Therefore, I thought it would be fun to share what I discovered. First of all, the primary goal of my research was an attempt to ascertain how much diversification within an asset class was the appropriate amount. Stated more simply, how many stocks were enough to protect the money and how many stocks were too much to dilute or destroy returns. Although I didn't come up with a precise answer that satisfied me, I did discover some fascinating numbers.

Utilizing the F.A.S.T. Graphs research tool I ran 20-year track records on several well-known indices that contained a low of 30 stocks all the way up to 5000 stocks. Before I ran these various records, I assumed that the indicie with the least number of companies would produce the highest rates of return and vice versa.

30 Dow Jones Industrials’ 20-year Record

My first example is the DJIA, because it is a diversified portfolio but only contains 30 names. As expected, the 30 Dow Jones Industrials did produce the highest rate of return at 7.3% per annum.

The S&P 500 Without Dividends

My second example is the S&P 500. Since the index contains 500 companies, I expected to see a lower annual rate of return due to the much broader diversification. Even though I was correct, the return differential was only 1.2% per annum coming in at 6.1%. From the standpoint of risk, you could say that you didn't give up much return for the greater safety.

Since this article is all about diversification, I have included the sector breakdown of the S&P 500 in order to illustrate the diversification within this broad index. I found it interesting that Information Technology was the biggest sector at 20.46%. To me this indicates that the S&P 500 is actually an aggressive index, even though it is diversified.

Russell 3000 Index Without Dividends

With my third example I increased the size of the universe by a factor of 5 by calculating the Russell 3000. Astonishingly, this larger universe actually generated a modestly higher rate of return of 6.3% per annum versus 6.1% for the S&P 500. In this case, greater diversification actually increased my return, but not by very much.

The Dow Jones Wilshire 5000

With my final example I calculated the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 composite which at 5000 names was the biggest index I could find. Remarkably, this biggest index of all produced the second highest rate of return at 6.4% per annum.

Frankly, I'm not really certain what to make of the results I discovered. From what I learned, diversification doesn't really impact the rate of return by very much when looked at from the perspective of the average company in the universe. This led me to wondering what a universe of the top 10 best performing stocks might look like. Of course I recognize that the flaw in this line of thinking would be having the foresight to pick the top 10 at the beginning of this exercise. However, my curiosity was not about being smart enough to pick the very best; instead, I was just curious to know what the differentials would actually be.

Therefore, I first sorted the top 10 of the 30 Dow Jones Industrials and listed them in order of best-performing to lowest-performing for the past 20 years. The average performance of an equally weighted investment in each of these candidates would have averaged approximately 13.8% per annum which is just shy of doubling the rate of return for the entire composite of 30 names. To put this into perspective, $1 million equally allocated total investment spread into these top 10 companies would grow to over $12 million in 20 years.  I thought this was interesting, but not terribly exciting. The following table shows the results of the top 10 best-performing 30 Dow Jones Industrials with $100,000 invested in each at the beginning of 1993.

 

With my second example I went to the larger universe of the S&P 500. With a much bigger universe to draw upon a discovered a significantly higher average rate of return. As it relates to diversification, I'm really not sure what this means other than a bigger universe offered a much bigger opportunity to find significantly above-average investments. The top 10 best-performing S&P 500 companies produced an average return of almost 25% per annum. Therefore, the same $1 million equally allocated across these 10 names grew to over $68 million. Now, that number got my attention.

Now, once again, admitting that this last little exercise is fraught with error, I do feel that it revealed some interesting information. Perhaps most importantly, it did reveal a large disparity between the best performers versus the average performance. If you did possess the skills of a legendary investor, you just might be better served to focus your attention on only a few of the very best companies you could identify. However, for the rest of us we might be best served by placing our money spread out and into more baskets.

Summary and Conclusions

As I began digging into the many faces of diversification, I quickly learned that it is a much more complex concept than at first meets the eye. But perhaps most importantly of all, I feel I learned that there is no one-size-fits-all or even a set of universally applicable rules or principles. To a great extent, diversification turns out to be a very personal issue. How much or how little depends more on your goals and objectives, the knowledge and experience you possess, the time you can allocate to your investment portfolio, and of course, your tolerance for risk. Some of us need a great deal of diversification, while others could do with a lot less.

I will conclude this article by confidently stating that it only scratches the surface of what a comprehensive treatise on diversification would require. In many ways, I feel that I raised more questions than I answered. Therefore, I expect that more articles will be forthcoming. The one area that I feel I shortchanged the most was the area of broad diversification across many different asset classes. Consequently, an article dealing specifically with this aspect of diversification seems like a logical next step. However, I will end by saying once again that I believe that it is also a very personal concept. On the other hand, I do believe that no asset class should ever be used unless it makes prudent economic sense to include it.

Disclosure:  Long MCHP, MSFT, CVX, ESRX, XOM, UTX, CSCO & INTC at the time of writing.

Disclaimer: The opinions in this document are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the stocks mentioned or to solicit transactions or clients. Past performance of the companies discussed may not continue and the companies may not achieve the earnings growth as predicted. The information in this document is believed to be accurate, but under no circumstances should a person act upon the information contained within. We do not recommend that anyone act upon any investment information without first consulting an investment advisor as to the suitability of such investments for his specific situation.

Comments
Anonymous commented on 12-Oct-2012 03:56 PM
occungubobact Ugg Boots sale
LeatabampYou Could Try HERE
http://genuineuggboots88.webeden.co.uk
Anonymous commented on 13-Oct-2012 03:01 AM
Hi to every body, it's my first pay a visit of this blog; this weblog includes awesome and genuinely excellent stuff for readers.
Anonymous commented on 13-Oct-2012 05:37 AM
occungubobact ugg boots sale uk
LeatabampDiscover More
http://genuineuggboots88.webeden.co.uk
Anonymous commented on 17-Oct-2012 02:20 PM
north face outlet Qk58nhXb04north face outlet Qt14icTf36north face jackets An80ehQm34http://www.cheapnorthfacejacketsoutlet.eu 2bx
Anonymous commented on 17-Oct-2012 02:24 PM
moncler sale Nc34azDa00 moncler jackets Jr38lcBd93 moncler jackets Xg08vwZt39http://www.monclerjacketsuk.eu 2ax
Anonymous commented on 18-Oct-2012 10:28 AM
Hi, Neat post. There's an issue with your web site in web explorer, would check this¡K IE nonetheless is the market leader and a good section of other folks will omit your magnificent writing due to this problem.
pokies online aussie pokies casino games
Anonymous commented on 18-Oct-2012 01:27 PM
It is in point of fact a nice and helpful piece of information. I¡¦m satisfied that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.sump pump
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 02:16 AM
The must have summer
Canada Goose JacketsOutlet styles include the timeless denim and leather as well as cropped and trench-style style items.
Canada Goose Parkas Outletare great in winter for warmth; they can be great on different styles and can go with casual or formal looks.The
Canada Goose OutletExpedition Parka provides heavy-duty warmth thanks to its high-quality duck down insulation.It is not a novelty that military style tops the leading fashion trends
Canada Goose Jackets Outletdue to its refined and classic influences and qualities.
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 02:21 AM
The must have summer
Canada Goose JacketsOutlet styles include the timeless denim and leather as well as cropped and trench-style style items.
Canada Goose Parkas Outletare great in winter for warmth; they can be great on different styles and can go with casual or formal looks.The
Canada Goose OutletExpedition Parka provides heavy-duty warmth thanks to its high-quality duck down insulation.It is not a novelty that military style tops the leading fashion trends
Canada Goose Jackets Outletdue to its refined and classic influences and qualities.
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 04:08 AM
Designs of this season give you the unlimited cool feelings in this cool summer. The new designs of Coach products in the Coach Outlet enrich our daily life.
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 03:17 PM
Very interesting points you have mentioned , thankyou for putting up. "Nothing ever goes away." by Barry Commoner.Visit This LinkGoing Hereshe saidcheck herelink
Anonymous commented on 19-Oct-2012 07:09 PM

Anonymous commented on 21-Oct-2012 04:12 PM
I think other web site proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and great user friendly style and design, as well as the content. You're an expert in this topic!halogen oven reviews
Anonymous commented on 22-Oct-2012 12:20 PM
great post, very informative. I ponder why the other specialists of this sector do not realize this. You must proceed your writing. I'm sure, you've a huge readers' base already!kasino online
Anonymous commented on 22-Oct-2012 04:53 PM
Just desire to say your article is as astonishing. The clearness in your post is simply cool and i could assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work. Dehumidifier review | coffee grinder review |generator |http://humidifierreviews.us | leaf blower |paint sprayer

Post a Comment




Captcha Image


Testimonials


“I appreciate your work, Chuck. As a subscriber to FAST Graphs™, I use the tool to decide on whether to purchase additional shares of what I currently hold or to add a new holding. Your articles help me make full use of the tool and give other readers valuable information, if they take the time to learn. One of the biggest enhancements that I use is the FFO data added for MLPs and REITs.”


“When FAST Graphs™ were unavailable because of Hurricane Sandy, I realized how much I need them in order to make investment decisions.

(Wish I could be) Long FAST Graphs!!!”


“One more vote for the value of FAST Graphs™; just started a subscription to Chuck's great service (premium), and am having a ball analyzing so many stocks quickly.”


“I feel very ill-equipped to make investment decisions without Fast Graphs. :-)”


“Yesterday, I signed up for your F.A.S.T. Graphs™. It's a really amazing, valuable tool for checking over/undervaluation of stocks. Wish I had it years and years ago!!”


“Love the F.A.S.T. Graphs™: One glance and you know a whole lot.”


“About Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™: They are invaluable to me in making decisions about the stocks I own (in addition to what you are saying about doing other research) and the ones I hope to own in the future.”


"Chuck -- Your proprietary F.A.S.T. Graphs™ are a VERY impressive tool!"


“If there were an Investor Hall of Fame for people who have helped others with their investing, and sharing valuable information, you and your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ would get one of my selections.”


“I love Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™! Well worth the price of admission for what he gives you.”


"Chuck - Thank you for your well thought out articles. I tend to be a visual type of person so I really appreciate the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ approach."


"Great article, as always! I always look forward to your articles, and am especially eagerly awaiting your next in this series. I find the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ extremely helpful."


“Your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ put all of this in a single artful picture and the accompanying spreadsheets hammer home the point.”


“I use the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ method to evaluate all of my ideas. I recommend it for individual investors, since it helps them focus on data and get past the many emotional arguments.”


“I recently subscribed to the F.A.S.T. Graphs™, and these articles are helping me learn how to better use them. They really do give you a good quick look at the valuations picture. A much needed tool!”


“I also always appreciate the clear-cut information provided through your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ and articles.”


“Thanks, Chuck, for your F.A.S.T. Graphs™. Each of these graphs is worth 1,000 words in describing a company's growth, consistency and valuation. Thanks for sharing your graphs.”


“Thanks, Chuck. Love the F.A.S.T. Graphs™! It makes investing so much more clear.”


“Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™: They are invaluable to me in making decisions about the stocks I own (in addition to what you are saying about doing other research) and the ones I hope to own in the future.”


”I am amazed at the usefulness of your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ and I plan on using them for a long time to come.”


“Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™ will give you a tool to find those well chosen stocks...”


“Thanks for the F.A.S.T. Graphs™, Chuck. They are the best tool I've used.”


Recent Posts


Tags

PNRA AB long-term growth DRIP GrowthOriented Dividend Ideas Aristocrats earnings LQDT InformationTech TMP SPLS ESI HCP investing for total return diversified machinery CTRX fast-growing TIS hyper growth stocks DDS GES RBC TGH DividendAristocrats Valuation BMRC F LLY LH JCI T BOBE ICLR ATHM TNC MTZ CKSW HE PFG GEOS DOV EMR FOMC PPG FBHS ADM SBUX BOFI BANF PKG ITW, INWK JCOM long-term returns LMT BMTC AIG Utilities food service HNZ ALTE EE POT ULTA GPC DLPH value investing BIDU BCE SNH WEC InterestRates MSA OSIS ACR stock FDO ETP mid-sized MCK KFT EMR, MMM VCO REITs ACOM dividend-growth URI THC act CATY RRC TWX FLIC stock research tool PG FDX HSNI TIF fair value US Economy ACN TWGP SWK AMP BIIB GT SXL CELG FOSL BNS AAN BLK biotechnology OKE ABT MGA REXX 3NSRGY ITW PB FairlyValued BLL OGE RY SHR ADT OHI,EPR,WPG,JLL cash flow FTI,HTZ CRI ACM MSCC SCHW BF.B NTES GE UTHR MNR healthcare UN economy OHI WFC CAPE FRAN capital appreciation BBBY DGAS AZO SAM ROSE high-yield ABC NPM KSS DECK suvivorship IDA MGRC BCR JKHY consumer TE R LINE DOM ADP SO LL VTR NOG PAG true worth SU Champions Challengers DELL GAS CTCM macro DRI TSCO SIVB NEE CACI TNGO Fundamentals BAP Consumer discretionary NOC TROW investing for income RMD MSFT AKRX mid-cap AET investing for income,growth and income DD dividend paying Yield BWP RCII ACE JWML.Y intrinsic value,stocks,earnings,fundamentals,stock research tool,due diligence DLR MNK UNH CHS SCL DHR PPL AMCX COST PII EBAY ACI HAS PRAA LOW AFAM utility stocks FAF CHD CINF AFL,CVX,ED,JNJ,MCD,PG,SWK,T,WMT,TGT,ABM,AFL,BEN,BMS,CB,CBSH,CTBI CTBI FairValuation dividends SON RSO BHP fair valuation MKC STE KMP DTE SoundValuation DTEGY BCOR MA CTAS ANDE EXLS CPN TGT banks DKS CE FL XRX DORM SJM CMI HighQuality KMB VVC PCP C THO OUTR RKT AEP CAM O HP UNM SYT PBI SAVE AFSI VFC SNCR INGR MIDD FAST Graphs BigFive,Canadian MGEE intrinsicvalue THRM WASH MYL dividendpaying Telecommunications RAI EPHC WHR ANTM highqualityR MDP POM ASNA CNC regional banks ETN WU value trap SYY JWN NVS ABM HBI FinancialSector OII CPB APH MO EXC Industrial AEG QCOM JOY RS HGT beta BG DE BNS. X LZB SHW VMI total return MNTX intrinsic value POWR IPAR HIBB ORI DOW CSL COO FAST CXRX BAX MUR marketvaluation CBI value-oriented interest rates DividendChampions AA RDS.A MAN fastgraphs KO,CLX,CELG,JCP,GT,MSI,PEP,ED DVA UTX WGL UNP short ideas ZUMZ EK ORCL SCG AOS TU stock analysis free cash flow HCI value PNM JRN best-of-breed DR RTN INT CACC BEAV AAPL V IR IBN market currents Bond,TGT,UTX MAIN CLR Macro view SHOO INTC AGN dividend FLO UL MCHP AVD MPW CSCO DNB GOLD CASY CTL NKE WBA HPQ APEI LTM SBR TAC ENDP CAT GD TRV COH RSG,RTN HII AFG EV SPY investment FC LKQ FRED CAH HSC NFLX WRLD blue chip AMBN OKS ConsumerDiscretionary ESRX RRD BKH FCFS AAP VRTU Materials GMCR dividend growth due diligence CGY APD HCN SUBX SIG SILVER ACQ M PDFS FISV SWKS COL WY GWW D CERN BA growth stocks long-term investing WSM dividendGrowth cashflow MATW SNI NC ODFL SHPG stocks NSR SEIC technology HRS SRCE BH NA LXU MTW VZ VRX GLT dividend paying stocks TGI GPS dividends,earnings growth SBRA cyclical machinery WVR dividend growth investing PFE AXP CHE EMC above-average GIS AM BOKF CR sell CL OXY RJF RSG OZRK INFY PSX IR, LEN TEVA AMT CTSH CLF SWFT AMG CCK PCLN HOG CB GPCM UEPS HON CLX,EMR AVP IBM EnergySector CIO CFR MDT CVX,SWK,MCD,TGT,PG,WMT,JNJ,MDT,AFT,T,ED ETR PNR BRS utility BPL ED AZZ STMP GPI LLL ZBRA KCAP GNTX GILD LO GOOG AMGN NLY TICC MHP MMM AMZN CBRL DGX BDX EWBC stockResearchTool SFG CNSL ATW PRGO HCA SYNA ECL TSM AFL CVX HSY WLP K ALB ROST WMT EAT investing ED:SCG MHS HCBK ABBV WMT,ROST,GIS,GE,JNJ,KO THFF WAG XOM CRLI DFS WFM WWW TOT ENSG ECHO NROM KMT JPM MRK POR TUP BAC PNW portfolio SLW UHS SLGN market DPS dividend-paying BWLD BBY PM JSFT VAL market timing PCL WST DMRC CVS AIRM MNST SYK CM FUL TXT NSRGY long ideas DTV CanadianBanks suvivorship basis DRC FTR Overvalued Aristocrat BRLI HRL fundamental stock research tool FF KALU NSC PRXL earnings growth JNJ WIN JAZZ HD Dividend Champions BR PEP PortfolioDesign Share Buybacks GOOGL DividendIncome MELI long MCY BMS treasury AMAG Contenders AGLP GME COP Utilities Sector retirement KR KO growth CLX DIS DollarCostAverging MCD Market Outlook DAN ONE RIMM dividend income MAT ITC ARLP BHB stock research blue-chip biotech TEF TEG: WEC: QCOR ARRS CTG P FB BMO XEL CSX Stock Research Analysis CBU BEN Buffett PEG long-term

Archive

Testimonials


“I appreciate your work, Chuck. As a subscriber to FAST Graphs™, I use the tool to decide on whether to purchase additional shares of what I currently hold or to add a new holding. Your articles help me make full use of the tool and give other readers valuable information, if they take the time to learn. One of the biggest enhancements that I use is the FFO data added for MLPs and REITs.”


“When FAST Graphs™ were unavailable because of Hurricane Sandy, I realized how much I need them in order to make investment decisions.

(Wish I could be) Long FAST Graphs!!!”


“One more vote for the value of FAST Graphs™; just started a subscription to Chuck's great service (premium), and am having a ball analyzing so many stocks quickly.”


“I feel very ill-equipped to make investment decisions without Fast Graphs. :-)”


“Yesterday, I signed up for your F.A.S.T. Graphs™. It's a really amazing, valuable tool for checking over/undervaluation of stocks. Wish I had it years and years ago!!”


“Love the F.A.S.T. Graphs™: One glance and you know a whole lot.”


“About Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™: They are invaluable to me in making decisions about the stocks I own (in addition to what you are saying about doing other research) and the ones I hope to own in the future.”


"Chuck -- Your proprietary F.A.S.T. Graphs™ are a VERY impressive tool!"


“If there were an Investor Hall of Fame for people who have helped others with their investing, and sharing valuable information, you and your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ would get one of my selections.”


“I love Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™! Well worth the price of admission for what he gives you.”


"Chuck - Thank you for your well thought out articles. I tend to be a visual type of person so I really appreciate the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ approach."


"Great article, as always! I always look forward to your articles, and am especially eagerly awaiting your next in this series. I find the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ extremely helpful."


“Your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ put all of this in a single artful picture and the accompanying spreadsheets hammer home the point.”


“I use the F.A.S.T. Graphs™ method to evaluate all of my ideas. I recommend it for individual investors, since it helps them focus on data and get past the many emotional arguments.”


“I recently subscribed to the F.A.S.T. Graphs™, and these articles are helping me learn how to better use them. They really do give you a good quick look at the valuations picture. A much needed tool!”


“I also always appreciate the clear-cut information provided through your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ and articles.”


“Thanks, Chuck, for your F.A.S.T. Graphs™. Each of these graphs is worth 1,000 words in describing a company's growth, consistency and valuation. Thanks for sharing your graphs.”


“Thanks, Chuck. Love the F.A.S.T. Graphs™! It makes investing so much more clear.”


“Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™: They are invaluable to me in making decisions about the stocks I own (in addition to what you are saying about doing other research) and the ones I hope to own in the future.”


”I am amazed at the usefulness of your F.A.S.T. Graphs™ and I plan on using them for a long time to come.”


“Chuck's F.A.S.T. Graphs™ will give you a tool to find those well chosen stocks...”


“Thanks for the F.A.S.T. Graphs™, Chuck. They are the best tool I've used.”